2003年08月22日

文献紹介:The Decline of Education 2

by Donald E. Simanek, 1995
北村正直氏 の紹介文献
http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/decline2.htm

"We lost control of the situation when (back in the 60s or thereabouts) we accepted (or at least went along with) the notion that students were 'customers' and we were dispensing a 'product'. Schools tried to tailor the curriculum to student's perceptions of their needs (and desires). The curriculum became a smorgasbord, from which students could pick and choose the tastiest morsels, and it included a lot of 'junk food' with no intellectual nutrition. At some schools students prepared course and faculty rating guides that were circulated or sold. Courses were created to pander to special interest groups...."

"During these decades of decline we saw a proliferation of administrators when the real need was more faculty. All these overpaid clerks did was make more work for faculty, asking for progress reports, answers to questionnaires, forms in quintuplicate for even the smallest things. They created more levels of bureaucracy as an obstacle course for any upward-flowing ideas, and as an effective insulator to shield top people from the gruesome reality of life in the classroom trenches. Administrators' primary mandate seemed to be "Proliferate thine own kind." We also saw the spawning of studies, conferences, clinics, task forces, mission plans, and outcome assesments. None of these had any positive impact...."

tjst |8月22日 |URL:http://www.ac-net.org/dgh/blog/archives/000101.html |大学評価
Comments

分類「 大学評価」の記事より

大学評価学会 設立大会・総会 2004年3月28日 - 3/13
3・28講演とシンポジウム「任期制・年俸制導入と評価制度は大学と教育をどう変えるか」 - 3/02
「一〇〇〇校をはるかに超える高等教育機関を七年なり五年なりの期間で評価を終了しなければ法令違反」 - 1/23
国立大学法人評価委員会 総会(第1回2003.10.31)議事録 - 12/20
学位授与・大学評価機構による都立大学評価結果概要 - 12/05
(週刊朝日2003-8-29) 成果主義の「崩壊」 給料と直結やめた1部上場企業も - 11/14
国立大学法人評価委員会のページ - 10/17
国立大学法人評価委員内定 - 9/29
事務次官会議 国立大学法人評価委員会令を内定 - 9/19
「国立大学法人評価委員会令」に対する意見 - 9/14
文科省募集:国立大学法人評価委員会令の制定に関するパブリックコメント - 9/06
総合科学技術会議、国立大を独自評価 - 8/26
総務省が勧告強化 法人化後の国立大学も対象に - 8/16
8/1 閣議決定「中期目標期間終了時における独立行政法人の組織・ - 8/04
文部科学省高等教育局主任大学改革官の視点  - 8/01
喜多村和之「政官の論理 vs 大学の論理ーー認証評価制度に試行・実験の期間を」 - 7/30
岩本 進「多面的な評価制度をーー基礎研究軽視に懸念」 - 7/21
信なくば立たず―認証評価制度は実施できるのか - 7/20